Chapter 9
The Rise of Tyranny
WILLIAM Penn, the founder of the state of Pennsylvania,
succinctly defined the principle that leads to tyranny.
Those people who are not governed by God will be ruled
by tyrants. Citizen’s Rulebook, p. 18
Penn understood that the foundation of all freedom is
God. When we surrender our lives to God, through Christ, He frees us. If
we surrender our lives to Satan, he enslaves us. It is a tragic fact that
all who have rejected the matchless claims of Christ upon their lives and
service are certain to be used by Satan, either to be enslaved themselves,
or to enslave others. By contrast, the freedom of Christ is riveted upon
truth—
And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make
you free. John 8:32
Further, that truth is to lead us to the power of Jesus
to free us from sin.
What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the
law, but under grace? God forbid. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield
yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether
of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness? But God be thanked,
that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that
form of doctrine which was delivered you. Being then made free from sin,
ye became the servants of righteousness. Romans 6:15–18
For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is
the Lord’s freeman [margin: made free]: likewise also he that is called,
being free, is Christ’s servant. 1 Corinthians 7:22
One has only to be a student of history to see evidence
that the setting aside of godly principles leads to tyranny. Multitudes
today are entranced by the concepts of the New Age. These humanistic
concepts were systematized and refined by the ancient Greeks, and
inevitably led to hedonism and egocentricity, which foreshadow the
collapse of society. Not only does humanism appeal to the pagan mind, but
to the minds of infidels, atheists, and agnostics, who have no firm
transcendent principles by which to order their lives. Humanism also finds
an attraction in the heart of professed Christians who are unconverted.
But few would sustain such fervor if they had any
concept of the historical development of the principles that underscore
the New Age movement. New Age is simply old-fashioned pagan humanism in a
new guise. The consequences of such humanism are plain to see for those
who are students of history. One can only wonder how we can forget the
dire consequences of humanistic philosophy.
Some have proposed a "Christian humanism."
That is an oxymoron. Christianity is Christ-centered, and humanism is
man-centered. If one reads uncritically the writings of the French
philosophers of the eighteenth century, he may be charmed by the appealing
language and concepts that are presented—concepts that appear truly
noble, and that ostensibly uphold the dignity and equality of man. But
events of history testify that this philosophy was a worthless sham. We
must never forget that these very philosophies underlaid the French
Revolution, which led to the reign of terror, in which forty thousand
people literally lost their heads by the guillotine, and myriads of others
lost their lives in the Napoleonic Wars.
The great watch cry in the French Revolution was,
"Liberty, Equality, Fraternity." One cannot deny that humanism,
from a cursory evaluation, upholds noble and attractive goals. It
underlies many movements in society which seek to preserve the dignity of
man, and to protect him against abuses from tyrannical forces. While we
cannot support such goals, yet inevitably the ultimate result has been
tyranny itself. The reason for the discrepancy between the goals of
humanism, and its results, is not difficult to discern. Without Christ in
the life, men are naturally evil and are devoid of the possession of
divine power which alone can bring noble aims to society.
This is an evil among all things that are done under
the sun, that there is one event unto all: yea, also the heart of the sons
of men is full of evil, and madness is in their hearth while they live,
and after that they go to the dead. Ecclesiastes 9:3
The heart is deceitful above all things, and
desperately wicked: who can know it? Jeremiah 17:9
In many ways, humanism has proven to be a movement
reacting against those concepts of former generations, when millions of
oppressed people have been forced to abandon the value of life here and
now, and to look only to eternal life as an answer to their poverty,
misery, oppression, and persecution. We cannot deny that many claimants to
the title Christian have been in the vanguard of oppression of
their fellow citizens. However, when examination of such oppressions takes
place, they are seen as the result of allowing pagan concepts to
adulterate the divine principles of human freedom.
But humanism, swinging to the other extreme, ignores
the ultimacy of eternity and measures man by himself. In so doing it
replaces one evil with another. New Age concepts have been the harbinger
of revolutionary concepts, contending that man has the ability to lift
himself from the pit of abject wretchedness, to an elevated status where
love, unity, and harmony reign. Humanism provides false hope, by
proclaiming the view that man is himself able to eliminate all the
injustices and inequalities that we see in the world today. It is a matter
of irony that the Greeks who propounded this highly elevated view of man
are the same Greeks who built their society upon slavery.
Men having failed to learn from the tragedies of the
French Revolution, another small revolution took place in 1830 in Europe
and, under the leadership of King Louis Philippe of France, a major
revolution swept Europe in 1848, but again it failed to provide a panacea
for the ills and injustices of Europe.
Karl Marx, the German philosopher, later took it upon
himself to evaluate the consequences of the French Revolution and the
Revolution of 1848. He declared that the principles undergirding these
revolutions were sound, but that the execution of them had been faulted,
leading to their failures. It was his stated purpose to explain how a
humanistic revolution would succeed. The principles of Karl Marx were
accepted by the Bolsheviks of Russia. This led to the Russian Revolution
of 1917 and to the Communist Manifesto. The consequence was that about
forty million people lost their lives under Soviet Communism.
These events having been recorded in the annals of
recent history, it is inexplicable that once more large masses are looking
to such faulted concepts in the New Age movement as their salvation. These
humanistic concepts are expected to underpin the hope for one-world
government and the one-world religion of the twenty-first century. No
discerning Christian will accept such principles, which are built not upon
the freedom principles of the Word of God, but rather upon man’s faulted
philosophy.
Should the whole planet come under the bondage of
humanistic New Age philosophy, we may expect an unparalleled slaughter of
those who would resist these global aims because of religious, political,
or ideological convictions. For sovereign nations to surrender their
independence to a global authority will in effect lead to the surrender of
their citizens to the greatest slavery known in the history of the world.
Tyranny begins when unreserved loyalty is given to
fellow humans. A leader may have fulfilled great deeds of bravery, he may
have been a man of unparalleled achievements, but the yielding of
unqualified loyalty to human beings is the ground base of tyranny.
Unwavering loyalty is safe only in surrender to God. Unthinking loyalty to
a fellow human being leads to unchecked power, which inevitably will lead
to tyranny. Many countries have sent their soldiers to defend the liberty
of another country while depriving their own citizens of freedom. Very
frequently the liberation movements that have arisen around the world,
while professing to be the purveyors of liberty, have proven to be more
tyrannical, once they have taken over the reins of rulership, than the
government they have overthrown. Many of those who have shouted with glee
and ecstasy when the "liberators" have succeeded in overthrowing
the government of the country, have themselves soon found that under the
"liberation" government their lot is vastly worse. Frequently
they have not only forfeited their liberty, they have forfeited their
lives.
The citizenry of every nation must be vigilant in
protecting the freedom of the populace. If the people would always rise up
in vast numbers against any attempt to impose unlawful restrictions upon
their inalienable freedoms, then oppression could not survive. But all too
frequently the citizens of a nation are more concerned with prosperity,
comfort, ease, and pleasure than the recognition of the subtle erosion of
their freedom. If freedom became the number one concern of a nation, then
any government which sought to deprive its citizens of even the slightest
degree of freedom would be expelled from power before it obtained
dictatorial authority. The words of Samuel Adams, one of the signatories
of the American Declaration of Independence, should not go unnoticed.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility
of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us
in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the
hands which feed you. May your chain set lightly upon you, and may
posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. Citizen’s Rulebook,
p. 14
The Eastern European nations cast off the shackles of
Communism in 1989, and the Soviet Union in 1991, when the masses of
citizens united against their oppressive governments. These governments,
who for decades had held their people by fear, proved powerless when the
people united together against their tyranny. It is indifference, fear,
and cowardice of the populace which are the secret of the success of
tyrannical or oppressive governments.
|