Chapter 37
A Perceptive Woman
The year 1884,
six years into Leo XIII’s pontificate, a fifty-seven-year old woman,
Ellen Harmon White published a book entitled Spirit of Prophecy,
Volume 4, Pacific Press, Oakland, California. It was a book remarkable
in many ways. White was a diligent and careful student of the prophecies
of Daniel and Revelation and also of the history of the Christian
Church. She was not an alarmist, nor did she venture into flights of
fancy as so many would-be prophetic exegetists have been prone to do.
Hers was a prayerful daily study, comparing Scripture with Scripture and
pursuing the study of the works of credible historians.
White was a patriotic American, born in 1827 in one
of the New England states, Maine, where most of the population was
devoutly Protestant. She, herself, was raised in the home of a Methodist
lay-preacher. Since our maternal ancestors were Methodists, we share an
understanding of her spiritual background. Despite her loyalty to her
nation this woman correctly identified the second beast of Revelation 13
as her homeland, the United States. It was a painful realization and
went contrary to her patriotic instincts.
Further, as she recognized that the prophecy was
plainly indicating that the Papacy and the United States would unite in
the last day persecution of Christ’s flock, this concept ran totally
contrary to the evidence of her day. While her Methodist background
caused her no surprise in the specified prophesied deeds of Rome, the
complicity of the United States was entirely a different matter. It
tested her fidelity to Scripture, a test she withstood.
There were numbers of reasons in 1884 for rejecting
outright the declarations of the prophecy. We shall examine these.
First, the United States was the bulwark of religious
liberty. Her nation in adding the First Amendment to its Constitution
had guaranteed not only religious liberty, but the separation of church
and state. It was an example to the nations of the world. Our own
nation, Australia, in 1901 when the states federated, adopted the very
concepts of the United States’ First Amendment as Article 116 of its
constitution. This Article had incorporated both the non-establishment
clause and the free exercise clause from the First Amendment of the
United States’ Bill of Rights.
Richard Ely, Professor of History at the University
of Tasmania, himself a Presbyterian minister, recorded in his book "Unto
God and Caesar," pages 26, 42, 78, 122, 136, Ellen Harmon White’s
efforts to promote the adoption of Article 116 in the Australian
Constitution of 1901. Mrs. Harmon White resided in Australia from 1891
to 1900. Our grandmother once met her just prior to her departure for
the United States. Roger Williams was the founder of the state of Rhode
Island, which was the first state in history to specifically guarantee
religious liberty in its constitution. Roger Williams had written in
The Bloody Tenet of Persecution,
[It is] a monstrous paradox, that God’s children
should persecute God’s children, and then they hope to live together
eternally with Christ Jesus in the heavens, should not suffer each
other to live in this common air together. (Later published in 1848 by
the Hanserd Knollys Society of London, p. 370, note 1.)
In 1884, despite the apparent groundswell of support
to impose Sunday laws by enactment of the United States Senate, the
efforts of the leader of this movement, Senator Blair of New Hampshire,
proved fruitless. Americans still valued their stand on religious
freedom. Yet Ellen Harmon White wrote,
Protestantism will yet stretch her hand across the
gulf to grasp the hand of Spiritualism; she will reach over the abyss
to clasp hands with the Roman power; and under the influence of this
threefold union, our country [the United States] will follow in the
steps of Rome in trampling on the rights of conscience. (Spirit of
Prophecy, Vol. 4, p. 405)
Only a person absolutely true to Scripture could have
written such a prediction concerning the United States almost 120 years
ago. Without divine prophecy the claim would have been absurd.
Here we see foretold a fourfold union, consisting of
the three actors above—Apostate Protestantism, Spiritualism and Roman
Catholicism—together with the political power of the United States.
We have already documented the "Holy Alliance"
between the United States and the Vatican (see chapter "The Final Unholy
Alliance") and between Evangelical Protestants and conservative Roman
Catholics (see chapter "The Religious Right"). The Bakersfield
Californian, July 2, 1994, published a full color cartoon of Uncle
Sam stretching his hand across the "gulf" of the Atlantic Ocean to the
Pope. It was an uncanny depiction of that which White had written
precisely 110 years earlier, seventeen years after the United States had
broken off diplomatic relations with the Vatican in response to Pius
IX’s issuing his offending Syllabus of Errors.
In his book, The Ambassador’s Story, published
in 1994, Thomas P. Melady, the second United States Ambassador to the
Vatican, 1989—1993, wrote that the long period of the breach in
diplomatic relations between the United States and the Vatican,
1867—1984, a period of 117 years coincided with "a period of strong
anti-Catholicism in the United States." President Ronald Reagan had
resumed diplomatic relations with the appointment of William Wilson to
the post in 1984.
In 1951 President Harry Truman failed in his effort
to have the United States Senate affirm his appointment of General Mark
Clark as Ambassador to the Vatican. The thirty-three years between
Truman’s abortive effort and Reagan’s success included the pontificate
of John XXIII. In the chapter entitled "John XXIII" it will be seen that
John successfully allayed Protestant fears concerning the Papacy.
Melady, a Roman Catholic as was also William Wilson,
stated in his book that,
Suspicion of the Vatican had significantly
diminished largely as a result of positive interreligious relations
involving the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council. (The
Bakersfield Californian, op.cit.)
It is not without significance that this review of
Melady’s book was written by Rabbi Rudin, National Interreligious
Affairs Director of the American Jewish Committee. He noted the part
played by Melady in the creation of diplomatic ties between Israel and
the Vatican. After all, didn’t Scripture foretell that all the
world would wonder after the beast? (Revelation 13:3, emphasis added).
The long years of anti-Catholic
sentiment in the United States make Mrs. Ellen Harmon White’s
predictions in 1884 all the more remarkable.
In 1888 Ellen Harmon White authored a book which she
entitled The Great Controversy. There, quoting Revelation 13:3,
she stated,
The prophecy of Revelation 13 declares that the
power represented by the beast with lamb-like horns shall cause "the
earth and them which dwell therein" to worship the papacy—there
symbolized by the beast "like unto a leopard." The beast with two
horns is also to say "to them that dwell on the earth, that they
should make an image to the beast;" and, furthermore, it is to command
all, "both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond," to receive
"the mark of the beast." [Rev. 13:11—16.] It has been shown that the
United States is the power represented by the beast with lamb-like
horns, and that this prophecy will be fulfilled when the United States
shall enforce Sunday observance, which Rome claims as the special
acknowledgment of her supremacy. But in this homage to [the] papacy
the United States will not be alone. The influence of Rome in the
countries that once acknowledged her dominion, is still far from being
destroyed. And prophecy foretells a restoration of her power. (The
Great Controversy, pp. 578, 579, 1888 ed.)
It was a brave declaration, one indicative of the
author’s profound trust in the divine inspiration of Scripture, when it
is considered that Protestant America seethed with anti-Catholic
sentiment at the time she penned her conclusion.
In 1846, when Ellen Harmon White was nineteen years
old, Samuel J. Cassels, a Presbyterian minister of Norfolk, Virginia,
published a book entitled Christ and Antichrist. The alternative
name printed in the title page of the book was Jesus of Nazareth
Proved to be the Messiah and the Papacy Proved to be the Antichrist
Predicted in the Holy Scriptures. This book was published by the
Presbyterian Board of Publication, Philadelphia. Leading clerics of the
Presbyterian, Baptist, Methodist and Episcopalian churches gave the book
their endorsement. This Protestant view of the Papacy extended
throughout mainstream American Protestantism until the end of the
nineteenth century and persisted to a considerable extent to the end of
the twentieth century. While American anti-Catholic sentiment prevailed,
the future alliance of the United States and the Vatican was a chimera.
Yet White was not turned from Biblical pronouncements by this situation.
Second, in her 1884 book on this subject written only
fourteen years after Pius IX proclaimed the dogma of Papal
Infallibility, Ellen Harmon White referred to the long tradition of this
claim and wrote concerning future Protestant complacency, not as if
writing in the nineteenth century, but rather in our century, the
twenty-first. The ecumenical movement has led to Protestants becoming
lulled into a sense of amnesia. They have, in general, lost all memory
of Papal history. Even when John Paul II in 1998 threatened
"whoever,"—not just the Roman Catholic faithful—whoever did not abide by
Roman Catholic dogma would be "punished as a heretic," (Apostolic
Letter, Ad tuendum fidem)—we Protestants slept on in a state of
somnolence akin to a deep coma. Thus Ellen Harmon White’s words, so
perceptive, rooted in her study of Revelation, are a wake-up call for us
today. They, too, speak to the hearts of Roman Catholics and
non-Christians. It is high time to heed the Apostle Paul’s admonition:
And that, knowing the time, that now it is high
time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when
we believed. (Romans 13:11)
Ye are all the children of light, and the children
of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. (1 Thessalonians
5:5)
Read Ellen Harmon White’s perceptive words with care.
The defenders of popery declare that she has been
maligned; and the Protestant world is inclined to accept the
statement. Many urge that it is unjust to judge the Romish Church of
today by the abominations and absurdities that marked her reign during
the centuries of ignorance and darkness. They excuse her horrible
cruelty as the result of the barbarism of the times, and plead that
civilization has changed her sentiments. (Spirit of Prophecy,
vol 4, p. 380)
Ellen Harmon White’s words are amply fulfilled today.
Roman Catholic historians are excusing the cruelties and injustice of
the Papacy. The Brisbane Courier Mail of November 2, 1998,
reporting on the views of Roman Catholic historians, stated,
Modern scholars have for several decades been
reappraising the Inquisition. Some now maintain that the justice it
meted out, although brutal, was neither capricious nor unusual for the
times.
What these scholars failed to declare was that the
brutality of the times was the responsibility of the Roman Catholic
Church which so dominated Europe that it set the trends, the standards
and the atmosphere of the society. Even worse, it was this church which
sanctified such brutality as a service to God.
Ellen Harmon White perceptively pointed to the Dogma
of Papal Infallibility, proclaimed only fourteen years prior to
authoring her book. She set forth the chilling implications of this
dogma, implications which Scriptural prophecy in Revelation chapter 13
declares will be fulfilled just prior to Christ’s Second Coming.
Have these persons forgotten the claim of
infallibility for eight hundred years put forth by this haughty power?
So far from relinquishing this claim, the church in the nineteenth
century has affirmed it with greater positiveness than ever before. As
Rome asserts that she has never erred, and never can err, how can she
renounce the principles which governed her course in past ages?
The papal church will never relinquish her claim to
infallibility. All that she has done in her persecution of those who
reject her dogmas, she holds to be right; and would she not repeat the
same acts, should the opportunity be presented? Let the restraints now
imposed by secular governments be removed, and Rome be re-instated in
her former power, and there would speedily be a revival of her tyranny
and persecution. (Spirit of Prophecy, Vol. 4, p. 381)
When those words were written it seemed quite
impossible that the Papacy would ever again muster such worldwide power,
unless—unless one believed the prophecy of Revelation. And this Ellen
Harmon White manifestly did. That the United States would unite in
persecution with the Papal power seemed impossible, but in the years
following 1980 we have seen the growing Vatican-American alliance. Even
today it is inconceivable in the minds of many that Rome would persecute
again—but she will; and the United States will provide the power and
authority for her to do so and aid her in this work. This Scripture
declares.
Third, the United States in 1884 was a relatively
weak nation as compared with the great European empires of Great
Britain, Germany, France, Russia and Austria. Its foreign policy was
dominated by the Monroe Doctrine. On December 2, 1823, President James
Monroe, America’s fifth president (after whom Monrovia, the capital city
of Liberia was named the previous year) issued the doctrine which bears
his name. It led to an isolationist mentality in the United States.
Monroe simply codified that which, twenty-seven years
earlier, George Washington stated in his farewell address, September 19,
1796. Monroe stated that,
The American continents, by the free and
independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are
henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by
any European power.
In fact in 1823 much of North America was as yet
unoccupied by western settlers, and other areas were in dispute.
Britain, France and Spain all had their eyes on America, and in the
Northwest the Tsar of Russia, who had claimed what is now Alaska, was
thirsting for more American territory.
In 1845, President James Polk invoked the Monroe
Doctrine against Britain and France who were scheming to take the
Yucatan province of Mexico. With the United States distracted by the
Civil War of the 1860s, Spain seized the Dominican Republic and France
set up a member of the Habsburg family, the Archduke Maximilian, as
Emperor of Mexico.
By 1870, with Ulysses S. Grant as President, the
Doctrine was immensely popular in the United States. The view that
"Europe and the Americas constitute two separate and distinct spheres of
political activity and, politically speaking, should have as little to
do with each other as possible," (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1963
edition, Vol. 15, p. 735) dominated American thinking. It was a thinking
which foresaw no American influence outside the Western Hemisphere. The
NATO of the twenty-first century then appeared light-years away.
But God had spoken and White believed. It was not
until 1917, two years after Ellen Harmon White’s death, that the first
breach in the Monroe Doctrine occurred. President Woodrow Wilson, the
last of America’s eight presidents from Virginia, took the United States
into the First World War as a belligerent.
But no sooner was the Treaty of Versailles signed,
two years later in 1919, than America returned to her isolationist
position, even refusing to join the League of Nations which was
established at President Wilson’s initiative. While in the inter-war
period the United States grew in population and military power, the
crash of the stock market in 1929 kept it focused inward as first
President Herbert Hoover and then President Franklin D. Roosevelt
struggled to reestablish a vibrant economy. While initiatives of the
administration and legislature made some progress in this direction, it
took the Second World War to dispel the last vestiges of the Economic
Depression. |